The cost of wind-generated electric power has dropped substantially since the first modern turbines were installed in the 1980's. By 2004, according to some sources, the price in the United States was lower than the cost of fuel-generated electric power, even without taking externalities into account.[1][2][3] At this time, wind energy was reported to cost one-fifth as much as it did in the 1980s, and some expected that downward trend to continue as larger multi-megawatt turbines are mass-produced.[4] However, in the U.S., installation costs have increased significantly over the past couple of years, and according to the major U.S. wind industry trade group, now average over 1600 U.S. dollars per kilowatt[5], compared to $1200/kW just a few years ago. A British Wind Energy Association report gives an average generation cost of onshore wind power of around 3.2 pence per kilowatt hour.[6] Wind power is growing quickly, at about 38% in 2003,[7] up from 25% growth in 2002. In the United States, as of 2003, wind power was the fastest growing form of electricity generation on a percentage basis.[8]

Most major forms of electric generation are capital intensive, meaning that they require substantial investments at project inception, and low ongoing costs (generally for fuel and maintenance). This is particularly true for wind and hydropower, which have fuel costs close to zero and relatively low maintenance costs; in economic terms, wind power has an extremely low marginal cost and a high proportion of up-front costs. The "cost" of wind energy per unit of production is generally based on average cost per unit, which incorporates the cost of construction, borrowed funds, return to investors (including cost of risk), estimated annual production, and other components. Since these costs are averaged over the projected useful life of the equipment, which may be in excess of twenty years, cost estimates per unit of generation are highly dependent on these assumptions. Figures for cost of wind energy per unit of production cited in various studies can therefore differ substantially.

Estimates for cost of production use similar methodologies for other sources of electricity generation. Existing generation capacity represents sunk costs, and the decision to continue production will depend on marginal costs going forward, not estimated average costs at project inception. For example, the estimated cost of new wind power capacity may be lower than that for "new coal" (estimated average costs for new generation capacity) but higher than for "old coal" (marginal cost of production for existing capacity). Therefore, the choice to increase wind capacity by building new facilities will depend on more complex factors than cost estimates, including the profile of existing generation capacity.

Posted by: admin - 3 Comments

3 comments for “how does wind electricity cost compare with fossil fuel cost for KW/h at this time?”

.1
jonmm

Currently wind energy costs A LOT more than fossil fuel energy. The company I work for is a supplier of key components for wind turbines. Many wind companies are currently developing wind turbines that will be more efficient and have a lower cost per kwh. It will take up to 10 years of development and implementation before wind energy achieves comparable costs to fossil fuel.
References :

January 8th, 2009 at 3:43 am
.2
alyazidi74

The cost of wind-generated electric power has dropped substantially since the first modern turbines were installed in the 1980's. By 2004, according to some sources, the price in the United States was lower than the cost of fuel-generated electric power, even without taking externalities into account.[1][2][3] At this time, wind energy was reported to cost one-fifth as much as it did in the 1980s, and some expected that downward trend to continue as larger multi-megawatt turbines are mass-produced.[4] However, in the U.S., installation costs have increased significantly over the past couple of years, and according to the major U.S. wind industry trade group, now average over 1600 U.S. dollars per kilowatt[5], compared to $1200/kW just a few years ago. A British Wind Energy Association report gives an average generation cost of onshore wind power of around 3.2 pence per kilowatt hour.[6] Wind power is growing quickly, at about 38% in 2003,[7] up from 25% growth in 2002. In the United States, as of 2003, wind power was the fastest growing form of electricity generation on a percentage basis.[8]

Most major forms of electric generation are capital intensive, meaning that they require substantial investments at project inception, and low ongoing costs (generally for fuel and maintenance). This is particularly true for wind and hydropower, which have fuel costs close to zero and relatively low maintenance costs; in economic terms, wind power has an extremely low marginal cost and a high proportion of up-front costs. The "cost" of wind energy per unit of production is generally based on average cost per unit, which incorporates the cost of construction, borrowed funds, return to investors (including cost of risk), estimated annual production, and other components. Since these costs are averaged over the projected useful life of the equipment, which may be in excess of twenty years, cost estimates per unit of generation are highly dependent on these assumptions. Figures for cost of wind energy per unit of production cited in various studies can therefore differ substantially.

Estimates for cost of production use similar methodologies for other sources of electricity generation. Existing generation capacity represents sunk costs, and the decision to continue production will depend on marginal costs going forward, not estimated average costs at project inception. For example, the estimated cost of new wind power capacity may be lower than that for "new coal" (estimated average costs for new generation capacity) but higher than for "old coal" (marginal cost of production for existing capacity). Therefore, the choice to increase wind capacity by building new facilities will depend on more complex factors than cost estimates, including the profile of existing generation capacity.
References :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind_power#Cost_and_growth

January 8th, 2009 at 3:53 am
.3
astazangasta

Wind is pretty competitive in terms of cost with fossil fuels. This site:
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Cents_Per_Kilowatt-Hour
has costs of 4-6 cents per kWhr for wind, compared to ~4 for coal and ~5 for gas. Corroborated by this PDF:
http://www.awea.org/pubs/factsheets/Cost2001.PDF
(which is a bit dated, from 1996), but has similar numbers, and also points out that with federal tax credits, wind becomes even cheaper.
References :

January 8th, 2009 at 4:05 am

Leave a Reply

Make Money at Home | Design: HRS Hersteller of skandinavische Häuser. Coding: Rutsche of Einladung Hochzeit.