<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Compare traditional methods of making electricity versus renewable energy sources. Is one method better &amp; why?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cutyourelectricbills.com/compare-electricity/compare-traditional-methods-of-making-electricity-versus-renewable-energy-sources-is-one-method-better-why/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cutyourelectricbills.com/compare-electricity/compare-traditional-methods-of-making-electricity-versus-renewable-energy-sources-is-one-method-better-why</link>
	<description>Cut your electric bills by generating your own electricity.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 11:34:59 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gooch</title>
		<link>http://cutyourelectricbills.com/compare-electricity/compare-traditional-methods-of-making-electricity-versus-renewable-energy-sources-is-one-method-better-why/comment-page-1#comment-291</link>
		<dc:creator>Gooch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cutyourelectricbills.com/compare-electricity/compare-traditional-methods-of-making-electricity-versus-renewable-energy-sources-is-one-method-better-why#comment-291</guid>
		<description>Solar is actually probably the best.  It has 2 main drwabacks though 1 the sun only shines a portion of the day.  2.  it isn&#039;t constant.  the pluses for solar are the long life of the solar panels(cells) 25 + years and there are no moving parts.  Right now there is a lot of study going into batteries like the sodium sulpher and the vandium redox  batteries that hold a ton of energy.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Solar is actually probably the best.  It has 2 main drwabacks though 1 the sun only shines a portion of the day.  2.  it isn&#8217;t constant.  the pluses for solar are the long life of the solar panels(cells) 25 + years and there are no moving parts.  Right now there is a lot of study going into batteries like the sodium sulpher and the vandium redox  batteries that hold a ton of energy.  <br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana1981, Master of Science</title>
		<link>http://cutyourelectricbills.com/compare-electricity/compare-traditional-methods-of-making-electricity-versus-renewable-energy-sources-is-one-method-better-why/comment-page-1#comment-290</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana1981, Master of Science</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cutyourelectricbills.com/compare-electricity/compare-traditional-methods-of-making-electricity-versus-renewable-energy-sources-is-one-method-better-why#comment-290</guid>
		<description>Wind power is actually very cheap, but the only problem is it can&#039;t provide baseload power.  It only provides power when the wind is blowing.  However, it can provide power at 7-10 cents per kWh, competetive with coal.
http://climateprogress.org/2008/05/17/wind-power-a-core-climate-solution/

Geothermal is also looking extremely promising, and can also potentially provide affordable power.  It can provide power 24/7 as well (baseload power).
http://www.ecogeek.org/content/view/2199/76/
http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/27/us-geothermal-is-hot/

Concentrated solar thermal is another great option, and can store energy to be used as baseload.  It can be potentially as cheap as coal.
http://www.ecogeek.org/content/view/2205/83/
http://climateprogress.org/2008/07/28/solar-baseload-update/

There are others like solar photovoltaic, tidal, etc.

There&#039;s no question that renewable energy is preferable to traditional (mainly coal) energy, because it&#039;s clean and the fuel source will never run out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wind power is actually very cheap, but the only problem is it can&#39;t provide baseload power.  It only provides power when the wind is blowing.  However, it can provide power at 7-10 cents per kWh, competetive with coal.<br />
<a href="http://climateprogress.org/2008/05/17/wind-power-a-core-climate-solution/" rel="nofollow">http://climateprogress.org/2008/05/17/wind-power-a-core-climate-solution/</a></p>
<p>Geothermal is also looking extremely promising, and can also potentially provide affordable power.  It can provide power 24/7 as well (baseload power).<br />
<a href="http://www.ecogeek.org/content/view/2199/76/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ecogeek.org/content/view/2199/76/</a><br />
<a href="http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/27/us-geothermal-is-hot/" rel="nofollow">http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/27/us-geothermal-is-hot/</a></p>
<p>Concentrated solar thermal is another great option, and can store energy to be used as baseload.  It can be potentially as cheap as coal.<br />
<a href="http://www.ecogeek.org/content/view/2205/83/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ecogeek.org/content/view/2205/83/</a><br />
<a href="http://climateprogress.org/2008/07/28/solar-baseload-update/" rel="nofollow">http://climateprogress.org/2008/07/28/solar-baseload-update/</a></p>
<p>There are others like solar photovoltaic, tidal, etc.</p>
<p>There&#39;s no question that renewable energy is preferable to traditional (mainly coal) energy, because it&#39;s clean and the fuel source will never run out.<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curtis</title>
		<link>http://cutyourelectricbills.com/compare-electricity/compare-traditional-methods-of-making-electricity-versus-renewable-energy-sources-is-one-method-better-why/comment-page-1#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>Curtis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cutyourelectricbills.com/compare-electricity/compare-traditional-methods-of-making-electricity-versus-renewable-energy-sources-is-one-method-better-why#comment-289</guid>
		<description>Hydro-electric dams and Nuke power plants are the best and cleanest, but environmental democrats oppose both.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hydro-electric dams and Nuke power plants are the best and cleanest, but environmental democrats oppose both.<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wished I could.</title>
		<link>http://cutyourelectricbills.com/compare-electricity/compare-traditional-methods-of-making-electricity-versus-renewable-energy-sources-is-one-method-better-why/comment-page-1#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>Wished I could.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cutyourelectricbills.com/compare-electricity/compare-traditional-methods-of-making-electricity-versus-renewable-energy-sources-is-one-method-better-why#comment-288</guid>
		<description>Yes, one Coal works, the others are a pipe dream.


Get real&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, one Coal works, the others are a pipe dream.</p>
<p>Get real<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
