I believe that renewable energy sources is a better method, but it is more expensive. If you could also provide statistics/facts I would appreciate it!

Wind power is actually very cheap, but the only problem is it can't provide baseload power. It only provides power when the wind is blowing. However, it can provide power at 7-10 cents per kWh, competetive with coal.
http://climateprogress.org/2008/05/17/wind-power-a-core-climate-solution/

Geothermal is also looking extremely promising, and can also potentially provide affordable power. It can provide power 24/7 as well (baseload power).
http://www.ecogeek.org/content/view/2199/76/
http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/27/us-geothermal-is-hot/

Concentrated solar thermal is another great option, and can store energy to be used as baseload. It can be potentially as cheap as coal.
http://www.ecogeek.org/content/view/2205/83/
http://climateprogress.org/2008/07/28/solar-baseload-update/

There are others like solar photovoltaic, tidal, etc.

There's no question that renewable energy is preferable to traditional (mainly coal) energy, because it's clean and the fuel source will never run out.

Posted by: admin - 4 Comments

4 comments for “Compare traditional methods of making electricity versus renewable energy sources. Is one method better & why?”

.1
Wished I could.

Yes, one Coal works, the others are a pipe dream.

Get real
References :

October 23rd, 2008 at 8:46 am
.2
Curtis

Hydro-electric dams and Nuke power plants are the best and cleanest, but environmental democrats oppose both.
References :

October 23rd, 2008 at 9:20 am
.3
Dana1981, Master of Science

Wind power is actually very cheap, but the only problem is it can't provide baseload power. It only provides power when the wind is blowing. However, it can provide power at 7-10 cents per kWh, competetive with coal.
http://climateprogress.org/2008/05/17/wind-power-a-core-climate-solution/

Geothermal is also looking extremely promising, and can also potentially provide affordable power. It can provide power 24/7 as well (baseload power).
http://www.ecogeek.org/content/view/2199/76/
http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/27/us-geothermal-is-hot/

Concentrated solar thermal is another great option, and can store energy to be used as baseload. It can be potentially as cheap as coal.
http://www.ecogeek.org/content/view/2205/83/
http://climateprogress.org/2008/07/28/solar-baseload-update/

There are others like solar photovoltaic, tidal, etc.

There's no question that renewable energy is preferable to traditional (mainly coal) energy, because it's clean and the fuel source will never run out.
References :

October 23rd, 2008 at 10:03 am
.4
Gooch

Solar is actually probably the best. It has 2 main drwabacks though 1 the sun only shines a portion of the day. 2. it isn’t constant. the pluses for solar are the long life of the solar panels(cells) 25 + years and there are no moving parts. Right now there is a lot of study going into batteries like the sodium sulpher and the vandium redox batteries that hold a ton of energy.
References :

October 23rd, 2008 at 10:13 am

Leave a Reply

Make Money at Home | Design: Hersteller of Spirulina. Coding: Versicherungen of Damenkleidung.